Is 16 mm wide enough?

Is 16 mm wide enough?

Do you believe a 16mm cropped lens is sufficient for landscapes, or should I invest on a specialized super wide lens? It's only just broad enough. 16-80mm is a useful range that encompasses wide-angle, regular, and short telephoto shots. As a result, yes, it has a wide range of settings.

However, this also means that you cannot control depth of field with this lens. A narrow focus range requires more careful manual focusing to ensure that some parts of your image are in sharp focus while others are not. This can be done by moving the camera away from or closer to the subject.

Furthermore, because it is a fixed focal length lens, compositions will necessarily be limited by how far you are from your subjects. If you want to show off a large area or go beyond what can be seen easily from one place, you will need multiple photographs taken at different distances or with a zoom lens.

Finally, because it is a fixed focal length lens, there is no way to adjust the angle of view (the ratio of width to height). So if you want to capture a lot of landscape in your photo, you'll have to move far away from your subject to get enough vertical space to fill up. Conversely, if you want to show a small detail close up, you'll have to get very near.

Is 24 mm wide enough?

Yes, if you're content with 24mm, it's broad enough. I have a Nikkor-N.C Auto 24mm f2.8 lens and am really delighted with it. Most of the time, I'll take a lens with a smaller field of view to shoot landscapes, leaving the 24mm in the bag. I do possess a 20mm, and I usually carry either one, but seldom both. They aren't that easy to carry around!

Both lenses are full frame, which means they will cover the entire size of a 35mm film frame. If you use digital photography, then there's no need to worry about sensor size; however, be aware that your images will be cropped when you print or display them.

Cropping doesn't affect your ability to publish your work online; instead, it just limits how much of the scene you can see at once. There are many reasons why someone would want a wider angle lens, such as capturing more scenery or subjects within the frame.

Many photographers also prefer a wider lens because it creates more depth of field, which means areas far away from the focus point will still appear in focus.

For example, if you were to capture an image with a normal lens, everything closer than the focal length (in this case, 10 meters) would be in focus, while everything further away would be blurred out. With a wide-angle lens, though, anything beyond the focal length is still in focus.

Is 24mm wide enough for astrophotography?

A wide-angle lens is recommended for easy, non-tracked landscape astrophotography and nightscape photos. On an APS-C camera, I normally recommend anything 24mm or shorter, and on a full frame camera, something 35mm or shorter. Finally, for a 4/3 camera, a lens of roughly 16mm or shorter will suffice.

These are the standard focal lengths used for photographing landscapes with no specific subject in mind. They are also appropriate for nightscapes and astro photographs. However, if you want to capture more detail at a reasonable distance, consider getting a wider angle lens (35mm or longer).

Furthermore, wide angles tend to have shallow depth of field, which means that only part of the image will be in focus. For example, if you were to focus on a small but recognizable feature like a blade of grass, it would be difficult to recreate the scene and include both the grass and the sky in sharp focus at the same time.

To solve this problem, you need a lens with good depth of field. The best option on a camera with an APS-C sensor is probably a f/1.8 or faster lens, such as one from Panasonic or Sigma. On a full frame camera, a f/2.8 or faster lens gives you better quality overall while still allowing for some shallow depth of field. Finally, on a 4/3 camera, anything from about 20mm to above 300mm should work well.

Is 16mm a wide angle?

Wide angle lenses with focal lengths ranging from 35mm to 24mm are considered typical. When we say wide angle, we typically mean between 24mm and 16mm. Ultra wide angles have focal lengths less than 16 mm.

These are very broad perspectives indeed. There are many different types of lenses that fall into this category, some focusing closer than others. In fact, there are positive factors for using a lens that is not as wide as it could be: you can get closer shots without losing much depth of field, and you don't need as large an image sensor as one that covers a full frame (APSC).

The main disadvantage of these lenses is their wide perspective. It's difficult to place elements in the scene that aren't going to look huge when viewed through them. This isn't so much of a problem if you're only shooting still images, but if you also want to be able to record video with your camera, you'll need to make sure that the widest angle available on your body is not wider than 24mm.

There are many ways to improve the appearance of wide angle photographs. You can use special filters to distort or enlarge certain parts of the image. Elements placed outside of the usual range of focal lengths can be used to do the same thing.

About Article Author

Alton Bellendir

Alton Bellendir is a man of many passions. He loves to write, read, and speak about all things literary. He also enjoys meeting up with friends for a pint or a cup of coffee to chat about books they've each been reading.

Disclaimer is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to

Related posts